340 cipher dimensions
Moderators: Bullitt, Aud8us, Michael Butterfield, johnny5
Re: 340 cipher dimensions
Zab - no need to apologise, since I thought you might have hit upon something and wasn't aware of the Woolworth explanation. All good; without an hypothesis or two there can be no conclusion eh? 
- Zabagliona

- Posts: 961
- Joined: Mon May 17, 2010 10:34 am
Re: 340 cipher dimensions
Thank you for putting up with me, smithy...I don't have your brains and intellect, but I still try my best...LOL
Maybe Z shopped here for his cards, stamps, pens, etc.....old, weird, small family drugstore that also sold other things....I think it is closed now...It would be interesting if someone could find and talk to a store manager from the late sixties, to see if he/she remembers any "interesting" regular customers...

Looks like the Long's Drugstores were all bought out by CVS, and this one in Vallejo has also become a CVS. Seriously, though, I would love to find the store manager from the late '60's and talk to him/her...There were two in Vallejo, and a few in San Fran as well...
Maybe Z shopped here for his cards, stamps, pens, etc.....old, weird, small family drugstore that also sold other things....I think it is closed now...It would be interesting if someone could find and talk to a store manager from the late sixties, to see if he/she remembers any "interesting" regular customers...
Looks like the Long's Drugstores were all bought out by CVS, and this one in Vallejo has also become a CVS. Seriously, though, I would love to find the store manager from the late '60's and talk to him/her...There were two in Vallejo, and a few in San Fran as well...
Re: 340 cipher dimensions
aquiman wrote:I'm pretty sure the paper is from Woolworth's. Woolworth's sold "Fifth Avenue Linen" stationery... the brand name was also used on cheap pens and various other items to imply that they were "higher end" (and they weren't). Every once in a while, you can find "vintage" packs of the stationery on eBay - with the Fifth Aveneue watermark. A recent seller claimed the dimensions were "7 x 5.5 folded", which I assume means they are about 7" x 11". These dimensions, however, do not exactly correspond to the "ruler" pasted to the 340 matting. If you assume each major tick mark on the ruler is 1/2", I get about 7 1/4" x 10 1/2".
You can check out a recent auction at http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:I9fdcMCWKyAJ:cgi.ebay.com.sg/Vintage-Linen-Finish-Stationery-Fifth-Ave-Woolworth-Co-/190505670968+%22fifth+avenue+linen%22+%2Bstationery&cd=2&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&source=www.google.com. The picture is unfortunately no longer available.
-A
This old Woolworth's ad from a September 29, 1960 newspaper confirms that a 7 1/4" x 10 1/2" stationery size was available:


Re: 340 cipher dimensions
"Fifth Avenue linen" stationery may also have been used for the random letters in the Charles Lindbergh baby kidnapping crime:
Source 1
Source 2
Dunno how credible those sources are though.
Source 1
Source 2
Dunno how credible those sources are though.
Re: 340 cipher dimensions
Interesting.
D., did you post this to show how pervasive the use of this Woolworth's stationery is, or to draw some other parallel....?
I didn't know that the Lindbergh notes were signed "with a symbol" until now. I should get out more, I know.
http://www.lindberghkidnappinghoax.com/ransom.html
Are you intimating that Z., the "student of crime", was aware of the Lindbergh case details and derived some ideas from them? Or am I just off on one.
D., did you post this to show how pervasive the use of this Woolworth's stationery is, or to draw some other parallel....?
I didn't know that the Lindbergh notes were signed "with a symbol" until now. I should get out more, I know.
http://www.lindberghkidnappinghoax.com/ransom.html
Are you intimating that Z., the "student of crime", was aware of the Lindbergh case details and derived some ideas from them? Or am I just off on one.
Re: 340 cipher dimensions
smithy wrote:Interesting.
D., did you post this to show how pervasive the use of this Woolworth's stationery is, or to draw some other parallel....? Are you intimating that Z., the "student of crime", was aware of the Lindbergh case details and derived some ideas from them? Or am I just off on one.
I cannot make any of those conclusions. I'm just presenting what I found. Maybe someone wil try to find Lindbergh's name all over the ciphers.
The best bit, to me, is the confirmation of the stationery dimensions which match our estimate based on the forensic ruler.
- Zabagliona

- Posts: 961
- Joined: Mon May 17, 2010 10:34 am
Re: 340 cipher dimensions
I have no idea whether this site is nutz or not, but they had a decent photographic representation of the symbols on the Lindbergh Baby ransom notes...
http://www.lindberghkidnappinghoax.com/ransom.html
Also, thank you, thank you, Doranchak....I knew I had posted something similar on Z's shopping habits, etc., in the past, but could not find it....Alzheimer's moment, I guess...LOL

http://www.lindberghkidnappinghoax.com/ransom.html
Also, thank you, thank you, Doranchak....I knew I had posted something similar on Z's shopping habits, etc., in the past, but could not find it....Alzheimer's moment, I guess...LOL
"Don't make me get my flying monkeys!"
Re: 340 cipher dimensions
That forensic ruler seems to use the decimal inch unit of measure. With such a ruler, every inch is separated in tenths of inches. In the picture of the z340, the tape ruler would be 3 inches long.
As an example, in the picture linked below, the 6" ruler on top uses the decimal inch unit of measure:
http://www.woodrow.net/images/photos/productphoto36.jpg
As an example, in the picture linked below, the 6" ruler on top uses the decimal inch unit of measure:
http://www.woodrow.net/images/photos/productphoto36.jpg
- traveller1st

-
- Posts: 573
- Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 5:30 pm
- Location: Northern Ireland
Re: 340 cipher dimensions
I placed the 340 on a Photoshop page sized to 7 1/4" x 10 1/2". Scales perfectly.
"I don’t know Chief, he’s very smart or very dumb."
Re: 340 cipher dimensions
Yes it does Trav. That's got to please the designer in you, nuh?
Praise the believer!
(Whoops, I almost got that wrong...).
Yes, it seems the forensic scale is divided into tenths of an inch - which surprised me for something used in 1969, but W(TF)DIK?!
_pi wrote:That forensic ruler seems to use the decimal inch unit of measure.....
Praise the believer!
Yes, it seems the forensic scale is divided into tenths of an inch - which surprised me for something used in 1969, but W(TF)DIK?!
Return to November 8, 1969: The 340-symbol Cipher
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

