Register

The Zodiac (from 2005)

Moderators: Bullitt, Aud8us, Michael Butterfield, johnny5

Level 3
Posts: 65
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 12:43 pm

The Zodiac (from 2005)

Postby fanatic » Tue Apr 27, 2010 1:01 pm

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0371739/

did someone watch this movie? I DL it, interesting, but nothing special

Level 5
User avatar
Posts: 292
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 3:39 am
Location: Inside your closet. In your head.

Re: The Zodiac (from 2005)

Postby Lucifer's Angel » Tue Apr 27, 2010 2:12 pm

I loved this movie. Better than the 2007 film, I say.

Level 3
Posts: 65
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 12:43 pm

Re: The Zodiac (from 2005)

Postby fanatic » Tue Apr 27, 2010 3:14 pm

Lucifer's Angel wrote:I loved this movie. Better than the 2007 film, I say.


I don't agree with you.

1st: Names were changed, that made me angry
2nd: many of scenes were imagined, fake, like scene where Zodiac follows son of the inspector

but, it is solid movie to watch

Level 5
User avatar
Posts: 938
Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009 4:37 pm

Re: The Zodiac (from 2005)

Postby Curt Rowlett » Tue Apr 27, 2010 5:09 pm

I have this on DVD. While the movie does not follow many of the historical facts of the Zodiac murders, it is actually a pretty good film. The recreations of the murders were, in many ways, better done and a lot spookier than the Fincher film Zodiac.

Level 5
User avatar
Posts: 2363
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 5:37 pm

Re: The Zodiac (from 2005)

Postby Zsearcher » Tue Apr 27, 2010 10:49 pm

Wasn't Paul Stine a black woman in this movie?

Level 3
User avatar
Posts: 61
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 3:58 am

Re: The Zodiac (from 2005)

Postby Brian D » Wed Apr 28, 2010 1:54 am

Zsearcher wrote:Wasn't Paul Stine a black woman in this movie?


Uh, no. . .

Level 5
User avatar
Posts: 687
Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2009 1:55 am
Location: Long Beach

Re: The Zodiac (from 2005)

Postby johnny5 » Tue May 04, 2010 2:14 am

As strange as it may sound I like the fact that they diverged from the facts so heavily.
With the Fincher film they were trying to pass it off as totally factual (or as close as they tried to convince the viewer they could get). The changing of the names and adding fictional characters the 2005 film made it clear they were fictionalizing the majority of the aspects of a real case(based on real events as opposed to hey everyone, Art Allen did it!!).
For me this made it tolerable that it was inaccurate and I was able to just enjoy the film for what it was.

Level 2
Posts: 31
Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 12:15 am

Re: The Zodiac (from 2005)

Postby mileaway » Tue May 04, 2010 2:30 pm

Fincher shoulda put in that Toschi's partner dropped out because Toschi (and him) were wasting time on a guy with *no* real evidence against him.
Of course u-no-hoo would stomp his feet and squawl.

Level 5
User avatar
Posts: 2363
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 5:37 pm

Re: The Zodiac (from 2005)

Postby Zsearcher » Wed May 05, 2010 10:55 am

Brian D wrote:
Zsearcher wrote:Wasn't Paul Stine a black woman in this movie?


Uh, no. . .



Oh yeah, that was The Limbic Region from '96.

Level 5
User avatar
Posts: 1446
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:02 pm
Location: The Zodiac Universe

Re: The Zodiac (from 2005)

Postby Bullitt » Sat Aug 14, 2010 1:56 am

fanatic wrote:
Lucifer's Angel wrote:I loved this movie. Better than the 2007 film, I say.


I don't agree with you.

1st: Names were changed, that made me angry
2nd: many of scenes were imagined, fake, like scene where Zodiac follows son of the inspector

but, it is solid movie to watch

Even though you knew absolutely nothing was going to happen to the kid, that was the one scene that creeped me out the most! There were a lot of differences between the 2 flicks, as we all know, but the most obvious one is this: Z's presence is definitely felt throughout this movie, but in Fincher's flick, Z is a ghost who you get brief glimpses of who then vanishes like mist...

Next

Return to Films & Movies

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest