Register

Bruce Davis "mug shot"

Moderators: Bullitt, Aud8us, Michael Butterfield, johnny5

Level 4
User avatar
Posts: 152
Joined: Mon Nov 09, 2009 8:47 am

Re: Bruce Davis "mug shot"

Postby Gavrilo Princip » Thu Jan 14, 2010 3:33 pm

para_owl wrote:GP..I'm interested in where you're going with this. Please elaborate a little more. Although, I do have some problems with the Manson/Zodiac connection that are similar to the problems I have with the Unabomber/Zodiac connection.


Will, don't get me wrong, I think Davis and Gaikowski are just as culpable in the Zodiac crimes (i.e. not at all).

I believe the party line is that Davis did the killings and communicated to a Family member or associate the details to initiate a campaign of terror in the Bay Area.

It doesn't really go toward Charlie's Helter Skelter scenario (I don't see how it would incite a race war), but proponents may argue that mass chaos and fear that may accompany a widespread terror campaign might "set the table", as it were, to touch off a race war.

I mean, outside of the things that make it impossible (the beard, the description of the surviving victims and witnesses), it is eminently plausible; immediately after Davis' apprehension the Zodiac writes that he will not announce when he kills people anymore (which is Zodiac-speak for "I retire"). The triggerman gets caught, no one else to do the wet work, makes sense. So...it fits, loosely. Nevertheless, we cannot ignore that Davis' beard when arrested mere hours after the Stine slaying does not jive with the descriptions given by at least three (and possibly four) eye witnesses who saw Zodiac at and leaving the scene of the crime.

So...no, it doesn't work, really, does it?

Level 5
Posts: 449
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2009 1:03 pm
Location: St. Louis, Missouri

Re: Bruce Davis "mug shot"

Postby para_owl » Thu Jan 14, 2010 5:07 pm

I realized you were playing Devil's advocate here. I had thought I had heard all of the conspiracy theories until I read that link in the Hypothetical Investigation thread. I'm glad people like Michael have Vincent Bugliosi on the record because I'm sure there were people saying "Why hasn't VB denied any of this conspiracy?"

So, I figured you were commenting on that theory or one that is very similar, and I don't think any less of you for doing so GP. I want to hear the far fetched theories because they are part of this cases history. I say let the theories be out in the open so we can shoot them down. If there was some truth to one of these theories it would have stuck around longer.

I'm sure there are many like me that have that first little thought that there are some similarities between the two cases. I know it can be frustrating for those that are more familar with the case to answer the ridiculous claims, but it at least it's on the record. With the right dialogue someone like me can ask for a little help and see that some of this had been looked into, but is no longer discussed because of the basic detective work like you mentioned with the arrest times.

--Will.

Level 5
Posts: 267
Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2010 1:31 pm
Location: 10 minutes from Heinz Field

Re: Bruce Davis "mug shot"

Postby LIVE55 » Mon Oct 31, 2011 12:18 pm

How much longer??
Seriously, how much longer can this REDICULOUS FARCE continue? :angry-cussingblack:
Yesterday, while perusing another popular Z-message board...
saw CURRENT posts and discussions of the thoroughly de-bunked
and,IMO, IMPOSSIBLE Zodiac/Manson Connection :angry-banghead:
Really?...IN THE YEAR OF 2011????

When will it END?...

Sorry for picking up and dusting off this TURD of a 'theory'...
but, like the Anouncer in Rocky 1, I ask:
"What is keeping him up? I just don't know.."

Level 5
User avatar
Posts: 1446
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:02 pm
Location: The Zodiac Universe

Re: Bruce Davis "mug shot"

Postby Bullitt » Mon Oct 31, 2011 10:34 pm

Something just occurred to me earlier as I read this: Charles Manson did not allow the Family any access to any form of media whatsoever (I've not found the reference in Helter Skelter yet, it is 600+ pages long after all), so that way, he controlled all information the Family had access to. If Bruce Davis was Z, how then did he (or whoever wrote the letters) know what the media & LE were saying about him in order to mention it in his letters??? Not only that, as we all know, Bruce Davis was arrested the day after PH, and the first Z story I found broke in Southern CA 3 days later, so how could the Family have known what was happening in the Bay Area anyway since most of the stories were confined to local papers and only a handful appeared in the Chronicle prior to Stine?

In addition the very idea that both the LA DA's office and the Manson Family are both engaged in massive conspiracies of silence for no good reason and the fact that Bruce Davis had long hair and a full beard when Z had a crew cut and was clean shaven only the night before, the very fact that Manson denied the Family access to the media is another serious flaw in the theory since they'd have no clue what anyone was saying about Z.
Image

The victims (known and suspected) and the
killer: these crimes will not be forgotten.

Level 5
Posts: 267
Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2010 1:31 pm
Location: 10 minutes from Heinz Field

Re: Bruce Davis "mug shot"

Postby LIVE55 » Tue Nov 01, 2011 9:29 am

Everything you said, PLUS, the little fact that Davis is
FIVE FEET 3 INCHES TALL!!
Like Bugliosi said: "Preposterous on it's face"
I mean,seriously, it takes litterally about 30 SECONDS of
research to find this 'theory' IMPOSSIBLE.

That is what gets me...how in the World does this still have legs?
I know there are gullible people out there...but, C'MON MAN!
Face the FACTS.
A phrase coined by Metaltomato comes to mind:
UNDEBUNKABLE!

--thanks to everyone for letting me vent-I will now stop waisting time
and space on this unethical CON-GAME and bury this TURD forever-- :lol:

Level 5
User avatar
Posts: 1446
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:02 pm
Location: The Zodiac Universe

Re: Bruce Davis "mug shot"

Postby Bullitt » Tue Nov 01, 2011 1:54 pm

LIVE55 wrote:Everything you said, PLUS, the little fact that Davis is
FIVE FEET 3 INCHES TALL!!
Like Bugliosi said: "Preposterous on it's face"
I mean,seriously, it takes litterally about 30 SECONDS of
research to find this 'theory' IMPOSSIBLE.

Was Bruce Davis wearing what, 6" heels to make himself look taller then??? I know that lifts can make you appear slightly taller, but come on... :laughing-rolling:
Image

The victims (known and suspected) and the
killer: these crimes will not be forgotten.

Level 5
User avatar
Posts: 573
Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 5:30 pm
Location: Northern Ireland

Re: Bruce Davis "mug shot"

Postby traveller1st » Tue Nov 01, 2011 3:04 pm

LIVE55 wrote:That is what gets me...how in the World does this still have legs?


Short legs at that.
"I don’t know Chief, he’s very smart or very dumb."

Level 5
Posts: 267
Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2010 1:31 pm
Location: 10 minutes from Heinz Field

Re: Bruce Davis "mug shot"

Postby LIVE55 » Tue Nov 01, 2011 6:05 pm

Nice one,Trav :lol: :lol:
For some reason unknown to even me, once a Month or so
I go to 'another popular Z-message board' (nudge-nudge,wink-wink)
to see what is passing for logic over there....
Why do I bother? :angry-banghead:
Can't say....I guess I keep hoping to find some of these 'theories'
are finally discarded. It does seem as though the Kaufmann Krazies
are gone with the wind.

Previous

Return to Bruce Davis and The Manson Family

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest